A Divided and Polarized City, or a Polycentric and Plural Megalopolis? The Crucial and Enigmatic Case of the Capital in the Study of the Socio-Territorial Polarization of the Vote in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v64i2.3062Keywords:
geographic political polarization, elections, partisan fragmentation, spatial and socio-territorial analysis of the vote, electoral geographyAbstract
This article studies the socio-territorial polarization of the vote in Mexico City, in comparative and historical perspective. Political polarization affects a growing number of democracies. However, despite the intuitive nature of the concept, there is no consensus on its definition, nor on its origins and consequences. The debate is marked by the case of the United States, characterized by a bipartisan and centrifugal polarization towards two opposing extremes that are becoming both increasingly distant from each other as well as more cohesive. In Mexico, by contrast, polarization occurs in a context of party erosion, volatility and fragmentation, with a centripetal dynamic that sets a pragmatic and hybrid government coalition against an even more heterogeneous opposition front in ideological, geographic, and socio-cultural terms. The study of this key case provides tools to understand and measure the socio-territorial polarization of the vote in the capital, and to place it in the Mexican and international context.
Downloads
References
ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. y Kyle L. SAUNDERS, “Is Polarization a Myth?”, The Journal of Politics, vol. 70, núm. 2 (abril de 2008).
ABRAMOWITZ, Alan, The Disappearing Center. Engaged Citizens, Polarization & American Democracy, Connecticut, Yale University Press, 2010.
ABRAMS, Samuel J. y Morris P. FIORINA, “‘The Big Sort’ That Wasn’t: A Skeptical Reexamination”, Political Science and Politics, vol. 45, núm. 2 (abril de 2012).
ACOSTA TORRES, Enrique, “El predominio del PRD en la Ciudad de México (1997-2018)”, tesis para obtener el título de licenciatura en Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública, UNAM, 2023.
ALGAN, Yann, Elizabeth BEASLEY, Daniel COHEN y Marcial FOUCAULT, Les origines du populisme. Enquête sur un schisme politique et social, París, Seuil, La République des idées, 2019.
ANSELIN, Luc, Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.
AZIZ, Alberto, “El retorno del conflicto: elecciones y polarización política en México”, Desacatos, núm. 24 (mayo-agosto de 2007).
BARBER, Michael y Nolan McCarty, “Causes and Consequences of Polarization”, en Jane Mansbridge y Cathie Jo Martin (Eds.), Negotiating Agreement in Politics, Washington D.C., American Political Science Association, 2013.
BELTRÁN, Ulises, “Ideología y polarización en la elección de 2006”, Política y Gobierno, vol. temático, núm. 1, 2009.
BISHOP, Bill, The Big Sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart, Boston, First Mariner Books, 2009.
BOBBIO, Norberto, Liberalismo y democracia, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1989.
BRUHN, Kathleen y Kenneth F. GREENE, “Elite Polarization Meets Mass Moderation in Mexico‘s 2006 Elections”, Political Science and Politics, vol. 40, núm. 1 (enero de 2007).
CAROTHERS, Thomas y Andrew O’DONOHUE, Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2019.
CASTRO CORNEJO, Rodrigo, “The AMLO Voter: Affective Polarization and the Rise of the Left in Mexico”, Journal of Politics in Latin America, vol. 15, núm. 1, 2023, pp. 96-112.
CONVERSE, Philip, “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics”, en Ideology and Its Discontents, David E. Apter (ed.), Nueva York, The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.
CORTÉS ADAME, Luis Javier, “La pobreza en las alcaldías de la CDMX: distintas realidades”, Nexos, 2 de febrero de 2022.
COSÍO VILLEGAS, Daniel, El sistema político mexicano. Las posibilidades de cambio, México, Joaquín Mortiz, 1972.
DARMOFAL, David y Ryan STRICKLER, “Bringing Together Spatial Demography and Political Science: Reexamining the Big Sort”, en Frank M. Howell, Jeremy R. Porter y Stephen A. Matthews (eds.), Recapturing Space: New Middle-Range Theory in Spatial Demography, Heidelberg, Springer, 2016.
DARMOFAL, David y Ryan STRICKLER, Demography, Politics, and Partisan Polarization in the United States, 1828-2016, Heidelberg, Springer, Spatial Demography Book Series, 2019.
DOWNS, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy, Nueva York, Harper, 1957.
DRUCKMAN, James, Samara KLAR, Yanna KRUPNIKOV, Matthew LEVENDUSKY y John Barry RYANET, “(Mis)estimating Affective Polarization”, The Journal of Politics, vol. 84, núm. 2 (abril de 2022).
FIORINA, Morris y Samuel ABRAMS, “Political Polarization in the American Public”, The Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 11 (2008).
GLAESER, Edward L. y Bryce A. WARD, “Myths and Realities of American Political Geography”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, núm. 2 (primavera de 2006).
GREENE, Kenneth, Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
GREENE, Kenneth y Mariano SÁNCHEZ-TALANQUER, “Authoritarian legacies and party system stability in Mexico”, en Scott Mainwaring (ed.), Party Systems in Latin America, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
HERMET, Guy, Alain ROUQUIÉ y Juan LINZ, ¿Para qué sirven las elecciones?, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1982.
HERNÁNDEZ, Rogelio, Historia mínima del Partido Revolucionario Institucional, México, El Colegio de México, 2016.
HOPKINS, David, Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI, Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI, “Producto Interno Bruto por Entidad Federativa 2022”, Comunicado de prensa número 774/23, 2023.
Instituto V-Dem Latinamerica, “Reporte de la democracia 2023: Resistencia frente a la autocratización”, Suecia, Universidad de Gotemburgo, 2023.
JOHNSTON, Ron, David MANLEY, Kelvyn JONES y Ryne ROHLA, “The geographical polarization of the American electorate: a country of increasing electoral landslides?”, GeoJournal, vol. 85, núm. 1 (febrero de 2020).
KLEIN, Ezra, Por qué estamos polarizados, Madrid, Capitán Swing, 2021.
KLESNER, Joseph, “The 2006 Mexican Elections: Manifestation of a Divided Society?”, PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 40, núm. 1, 2007.
KLINKNER, Phillip, Red and Blue Scare: The Continuing Diversity of the American Electoral Landscape, 2004.
LANGSTON, Joy, Democratization and Authoritarian Party Survival: Mexico’s PRI, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
LEVITSKY, Steven y Daniel ZIBLATT, Cómo mueren las democracias, México, Ariel, 2018.
MARTIN, Gregory J. y Steven WEBSTER, “Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization?”, Political Science Research and Methods, vol. 8 (abril de 2020).
MASON, Lilliana, Uncivil Agreement, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2018.
MCCLOSKY, Herbert, Paul HOFFMANN y Rosemary O’HARA, “Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers”, American Political Science Review, vol. 54, núm. 2 (1960).
MCCOY, Jennifer y Murat SOMER, “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies”, ANNALS AAPSS, vol. 681, núm. 1 (enero de 2019).
MCCOY, Jennifer, “Reflexiones sobre el populismo y la polarización en América Latina y sus consecuencias para la democracia”, Desafíos, vol. 34, núm. 2 (julio-diciembre de 2022).
MORENO, Alejandro, “Las elecciones federales 2021 en México: ¿plebiscitarias o identitarias?”, Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, núm. 32, 2022.
Naciones Unidas, Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD), Informe de Desarrollo Humano Municipal 2010-2020: una década de transformaciones locales en México, México, PNUD, 2022, https://www.undp.org/es/mexico/publicaciones/informe-de-desarrollo-humano-municipal-2010-2020-una-decada-de-transformaciones-locales-en-mexico-0 ;
NORRIS, Pippa (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.
OPENSHAW, Stan, The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, Norwich, Geo Books, 1983.
ORTEGA, Reynaldo, Fernando NIETO, Rodrigo DORANTES y Cristina SOTOMAYOR, Polarización estratégica en redes sociales, México, El Colegio de México, Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE), 2021.
ROBINSON, W.S., “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals”, American Sociological Review, 15(3), (1950), pp. 351-357.
RODDEN, Jonathan, “The Geographic Distribution of Political Preferences”, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 13 (2010).
ROKKAN, Stein y Seymour M. LIPSET (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, Nueva York, Free Press, 1967.
SARSFIELD, Rodolfo, “Entre el pueblo bueno y la élite corrupta: narrativa populista y polarización afectiva en las redes sociales en México”, Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, 35, 2023.
SARTORI, Giovanni, Parties and Party Systems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976.
SCHEDLER, Andreas, “Rethinking Political Polarization”, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 138, núm. 3, 2023.
SONNLEITNER, Willibald, “Le Mexique s’est-il polarisé ? Changement et continuités d’une géographie électorale plurielle et fragmentée”, Cahiers de Amériques Latines, núm. 104, 2024.
SONNLEITNER, Willibald, “Les élections de 2006 au Mexique : une société polarisée, ou une société fragmentée?”, Problèmes d’Amérique Latine, núm. 64, 2008.
SUBRAMANIAN, S.V., JONES, Kelvyn, KADDOUR, Afamia y Nancy KRIEGER, “Revisiting Robinson: The perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy”, International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, (2009), pp. 342-360.
Varieties of Democracy, V-Dem, Democracy Report 2024. Democracy Winning and Losing at the Ballot, Suecia, Universidad de Gotemburgo, 2024.
VON SCHOULTZ, Åsa, “Party systems and voter alignments”, en Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans y Michael S. Lewis-Beck, The Sage handbook of electoral behavior, Londres, Sage, 2017, pp. 30-55.
WOLDENBERG, José, Pedro SALAZAR y Ricardo BECERRA, La mecánica del cambio político en México. Elecciones, partidos y reformas, México, Cal y Arena, 2000.
ZUCKERMAN, Alan, “Political Cleavage: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis”, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 5, núm. 2 (abril de 1975), pp. 231-248.
