The metamorphosis of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s foreign policy: from an international populism to a transnational-limited one

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v63i3.2990

Keywords:

populisms, Turkish foreign policy, Tayyip Erdoğan, international relations, speeches

Abstract

The intention of this paper is to highlight the main points of connection between populism and international relations, taking as a case study Turkish foreign policy during the government of Tayyip Erdoğan (2003-2020). The theory that accounts for populism as a factor of emancipation are connected with foreign policy as a public policy that responds to intermestic demands. Then, some discursive fragments of the president’s speeches are analyzed, in the understanding that words are transformed into political actions, seeking to interweave populism as a constitutive framework of his speeches, foreign policy as his field of action, and international relations as his context of production, in order to understand the kind of foreign policy the Erdoğan government carried out during that period.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

ALAMI, Ilias y Adam D. DIXON, “State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversias”, Competition & Change, vol. 24, núm. 1 (2020), pp. 70-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529419881949

ALEMÁN, Jorge, Horizontes neoliberales en la subjetividad, Buenos Aires, Grama, 2016.

BABIC, Milan, Jan FICHTNER y Eelke M. HEEMSKERK, “States versus Corporations: Rethinking the Power of Business in International Politics”, The International Spectator, vol. 52, núm. 4 (2017), pp. 20-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1389151

BALTA, Evren, “The AKP’s foreign policy as populist governance”, Middle East Report, vol. 288 (2018), pp. 14-18.

BARR, Robert R., “Populist, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics”, Party Politics, vol. 15, núm. 1, 2009, pp. 29-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808097890

BECK, Ulrich, La metamorfosis del mundo (trad. de Fernando Borrajo Castanedo), Barcelona, Paidós, 2017, pp. 17-97.

BIGLIERI, Paula y Luciana CADAHIA, Siete ensayos sobre populismo, Barcelona, Herder, 2022, pp. 15-168.

BLENGINO, Luis, “¿Qué hay de nuevo, viejo? Populismo transnacional, nacionalismos autoritarios y neoliberalismo global”, (ponencia en la conferencia Fascism? Populism? Democracy), International Consortium of Critical Theory Programs, Brighton, University of Brighton, enero de 2019.

BUSSO, Anabella, “El vínculo entre los condicionantes internos y la política exterior. Reflexiones sobre el caso argentino”, Ciclos en la historia, la economía y la sociedad, vol. 30, núm. 52 (2019), pp. 21-40.

CALATRAVA-GARCÍA, Adolfo y Marién DURÁN CENIT, “Las relaciones de cooperación y rivalidad entre Turquía y Siria: impacto del conflicto sirio en la política exterior turca y las implicaciones internacionales”, Revista de Estudios Internacionales Mediterráneos, 33 (2022), pp. 38-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/reim2022.33.002

CAMERON G Thies, “Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis in Latin America”, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 13, núm. 3, (2014), pp. 11-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12072

CAMPBELL, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1992, p. 42.

CHRYSSOGELOS, Angelos, “Populism in Foreign Policy”, en Cameron Thies (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis (versión en línea), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018, p. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.467

“Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Bunu Değiştireceğiz Lamı Cimi Yok” [President Erdoğan: We Are Going to Change It, No Ifs and Buts], Hürriyet (19 de junio de 2018), https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/son-dakika-erdogan-bunu-degistirecegiz-lami-cimi-yok-40872086 (consulta del 14 de noviembre de 2022).

DE CLEEN, Benjamin, Benjamin Moffitt, Panos Panayotu y Yannis Stavrakakis, “The potentials and difficulties of transnational populism: The case of the democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25)”, Political Studies, vol. 68, núm. 1, 2020, pp. 151-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719847576

DE LA TORRE, Carlos y Enrique Peruzzotti, El retorno del pueblo. Populismos y nuevas democracias en América Latina, Quito, Flacso Ecuador y Ministerio de Cultura, 2008, pp. 11-76.

DODSON, Michael y Manochehr DORRAJ, “Populism and Foreign Policy in Venezuela and Iran”, The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, vol. 9 (2008), p. 71.

ERDEM AYTAÇ, Selim y Ziya ŐNIŞ, “Varieties of Populism in a Changing Global Context: The Divergent Paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo”, Comparative Politics, vol. 47, núm. 1 (2014), pp. 41-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041514813623137

“Erdoğan: Monşer Geldiler Monşer Gidiyorlar” [They Have Been Mon Chers and They Will Remain So], Milliyet, 13 de febrero de 2009, http://www.milliyet.com.tr/erdogan–monsergeldiler– monser-gidiyorlar-siyaset-1059445/ (consulta del 14 de noviembre de 2022).

“Erdoğan: Salon Sosyetesi Ülke Yönetemez” [Erdoğan: High Society Men Cannot Run a Country], Sabah, 18 de julio de 2014, https://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2014/07/18/salon-sosyeteleriyle-buulke-yonetilmez (consulta del 14 de noviembre de 2022).

FASSIN, Éric, Populismos de izquierdas y neoliberalismo (trad. de Johana Masó y Víctor Goldstein), Barcelona, Herder, 2018, pp. 15-65.

FRASER, Alastair, “Post-populism in Zambia: Michael Sata’s rise, demise and legacy”, International Political Science Review, vol. 38, núm. 4 (2017), pp. 456-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117720809

HAWKINS, Kirk A., “Is Chavez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 42, núm. 8, 2009, pp. 1040-1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721

HOBSON, John M., “What’s at stake in ‘bringing historical sociology back into international relations’? Transcending ‘chronofetishism’ and ‘tempocentrism’ in international relations”, en Stephen Hobden y John M. Hobson (eds.), Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 16.

KALIBER, Alper y Esra KALIBER, “From De-Europeanisation to Anti-Western Populism: Turkish Foreign Policy in Flux”, The International Spectator, vol. 54, núm. 4 (2019), pp. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2019.1668640

KALIBER, Alper, “The Post-Cold War Regionalisms of Turkish Foreign Policy”, Journal of Regional Security, VIII, núm. 1 (2013), pp. 25-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11643/issn.2217-995X131SPK28

“Kalın: PKK’ya Açılan Alanın Onda Birini Biz Batı Karşıtı Bir Terör Örgütüne Türkiye’de Açsaydık Herhalde Yer yerinden Oynardı” [Kalın: If We Opened One Tenth of the Space Provided to the PKK for an Anti-West Terror Organization in Turkey, They Would Probably Move the Earth], Star, 26 de octubre de 2017, https://www.star.com.tr/politika/kalin-pkkya-acilanalanin-onda-birini-biz-bati-karsiti-bir-teror-orgutune-turkiyede-acsaydik-herhalde-yeryerinden-oynardi-haber-1268464/ (consulta del 15 de noviembre de 2022).

KUTLAY, Mustafa, “The politics of state capitalism in a post-liberal international order: the case of Turkey”, Third World Quarterly, vol. 41, núm. 4 (2020), pp. 683-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1699400

LACLAU, Ernesto, La razón populista (trad. de Soledad Laclau), Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2015, pp. 15-198.

LAZZARATO, Maurizio, “From Pinochet to Bolsonaro and Back Again”, (ponencia en la conferencia Fascism? Populism? Democracy), International Consortium of Critical Theory Programs, Brighton, University of Brighton, enero de 2019.

LONG, Tom, “Coloso fragmentado: la agenda “interméstica” y la política exterior latinoamericana, Foro Internacional, vol. LVII, núm. 227 (2015), pp. 5-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v0i0.2381

MANNING, Bayless, “The Congress: The Executive and Intermestic Affairs Three Proposals, Foreign Affairs, 55 (1976-1977), pp. 306-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20039647

MARCHART, Oliver, Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413329

MORIN, Edgar y Anne Brigitte KERN, Tierra Patria (trad. de Ricardo Figueira), Buenos Aires, Nueva Edición, 2006, pp. 22-100.

MOUFFE, Chantal, For a Left Populism, Londres, Nueva York, Verso, 2018, pp. 9-87.

MUDDE, Cas y Cristóbal ROVIRA KALTWASSER, Populism: A very short introduction, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001

Nölke, Andreas, Tobias Ten Brink, Simone Claar y Christian May, “Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 21, núm. 3 (2015), pp. 538-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114553682

PHONGPAICHIT, Pasuk y Chris BAKER, “Thaksin’s populism”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 38, núm. 1 (2007), pp. 62-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651960

PLAGEMANN, Johannes y Sanda DESTRADI, “Populism and foreign policy: The case of India”, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 15, núm. 2 (2019), pp. 283-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/ory010

“PM Poses as a Mideastern Rather than a European Leader”, Hürriyet Daily News, 13 de junio de 2011, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=pm-poses-as-a-mideasternrather-thana-european-leader-2011-06-13 (consulta del 13 de noviembre de 2022).

ROSANVALLON, Pierre, El siglo del populismo (trad. de Irene Agoff), Buenos Aires, Manantial, 2020, pp. 15-100.

“Statement by AK Party General Secretary Gül”, SonDakika, 24 de julio de 2016, https://www.sondakika.com/haber/haber-ak-parti-genel-sekreteri-gul-aciklamasi-8641228/ (consulta del 13 de noviembre de 2022).

STAVRAKAKIS, Yannis, “Teoría del discurso en la investigación sobre populismo. Tres desafíos y un dilema”, en El goce político. Discurso, psicoanálisis y populismo, Buenos Aires, Pluriverso, 2021.

STENGEL, Frank A., David B. MACDONALD y Dirk NABERS, “Introduction: Analyzing the Nexus Between Populism and International Relations, en Frank A. Stengel et. al. (eds.), Populism and World Politics: Exploring Inter- and Transnational Dimensions, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04621-7_1

TAŞ, Hakki, “The chronopolitics of national populism”, Identities, vol. 29, núm. 2 (2022), pp. 127-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2020.1735160

TAŞ, Hakki, “The formulation and implementation of populist foreign policy: Turkey in the Eastern Mediterranean”, Mediterranean Politics, vol. 27, núm. 5 (2022), pp. 563-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1833160

TAŞKIN, Yüksel, “AKP’s Move to ‘Conquer’ the Center‐Right: Its Prospects and Possible Impacts on the Democratization Process”, Turkish Studies, vol. 9, núm. 1 (2008), pp. 53-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840701814000

TOOZE, Adam, Crash: cómo una década de crisis financiera ha cambiado el mundo (trad. de Yolanda Frontal Rueda y Efrén Valle), Barcelona, Crítica, 2018, pp. 1-200.

“Turkey’s Erdoğan: The West is taking sides with coup”, Al Jazeera, 2 de agosto de 2016, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/8/2/turkeys-erdogan-the-west-is-taking-sides-with-coup (consulta del 13 de noviembre de 2022).

VAN KLAVEREN, Alberto, “Entendiendo las políticas exteriores latinoamericanas: modelo para armar”, Revista de Estudios Internacionales, 98 (1992), pp. 169-216.

VERBEEK, Bertjan y Andrej ZASLOVE, “Populism and Foreign Policy”, en Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul A. Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo y Pierre Ostiguy (coords.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017, 384–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.15

WEYLAND, Kurt, “Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics”, Comparative Politics, vol. 34, núm. 1, 2001, pp. 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422412

ŽIŽEK, Slavoj, “Why populism is (sometimes) good enough in practice, but not in theory”, en In Defense of Lost Causes, Londres, Nueva York, Verso, 2009, pp. 264-333.

Published

30-06-2023