El Brexit y la relación entre el Reino Unido y la UE desde la perspectiva de un sistema adaptativo complejo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v62i4.2855Palabras clave:
Unión Europea, Reino Unido, Brexit, Sistemas adaptativos complejos, desintegraciónResumen
La relación entre el Reino Unido y la Unión Europea (ue) ha sido descrita como incómoda, y el Brexit representa la cúspide de esta tensión. Este artículo recurre al marco de los sistemas adaptativos complejos y al modelo “contenedores, diferencias, intercambios” (cde por sus siglas en inglés) para entender el Brexit como un punto de inflexión en el patrón de la relación entre el Reino Unido y la ue, desde la integración diferenciada hasta la desintegración. Asimismo, de acuerdo con la teoría posfuncionalista, se argumenta que el “disenso restrictivo” que surgió desde la década de 1990 ha estado presionando tanto para una integración más diferenciada como, en última instancia, para la desintegración.
Descargas
Citas
ASHLEY, R. K., “The achievements of post-structuralism”, en S. Smith, K. Booth y M. Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and beyond, Cambridge, University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013
ARNORSSON, A. y G. ZOEGA, “On the causes of Brexit”, European Journal of Political Economy 55(1), (2018), pp. 301-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.02.001
BACHE, I. y A. JORDAN, (eds.), The Europeanization of British Politics, Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627321
BAKER, D. y P. SCHNAPPER, Britain and the crisis of the European union, Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005205
CAMERON, D., “EU speech at Bloomberg, Gobierno del Reino Unido de la Gran Bretaña”, 2013, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/eu-speech-at-bloomberg (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
CAMPBELL, D., “Poststructuralism”, en T. Dunne, M. Kurki y S. Smith, (eds.), International relations theory: Discipline and diversity, Oxford, University Press, 2007.
CHECKEL, J. y P. J. KATZENSTEIN (eds.), European Identity, Cambridge, University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806247
CHURCHILL, W., “The United States of Europe”, The Saturday Evening Post, 15 de febrero de 1930, https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour/finest-hour-104/wit-and-wisdom-12/ (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
CIANCIARA, A. K., “Does Differentiation Lead to Disintegration ? Insights from Theories of European Integration and Comparative Regionalism”, Yearbook of Polish European Studies, v. 18, 2015, pp. 39-58.
CLARKE, H. D., GOODWIN, M. y WHITELEY, P., Brexit: why Britain voted to leave the European Union, Cambridge, University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584408
Comisión Europea, “‘A new dawn for Europe’, Joint op-ed by President von der Leyen, President Michel and President Sassoli”, Bruselas, 31 de enero de 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/AC_20_162 (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
Consejo Europeo, “Fontainebleau European Council (25 and 26 June, 1984) Conclusions of the Presidency”, European Council (25 y 26 de junio de 1984), https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2001/10/19/ba12c4fa-48d1-4e00-96cc-a19e4fa5c704/publishable_en.pdf (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
Consejo Europeo, “Reunión del Consejo Europeo (18 y 19 de febrero de 2016) – Conclusiones”, Bruselas, 19 de febrero de 2016, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21772/st00001es16.pdf (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).CURTICE, J., “British Social Attitudes. The vote to leave the EU”, NatCen Social Research, (2017), pp. 1-24.
CURTICE, J., “Why Leave Won the UK’s EU Referendum”, Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (5), 2017, pp. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12613
CURTICE, J. y MONTAGU, I., “British Social Attitudes - The EU Debate”, NatCen Social Research (2019), pp. 1-40.
DAHRENDORF, R., “A Third Europe?”, Tercera conferencia Jean Monnet, European University Institute, Florencia, 26 de noviembre de 1979, http://aei.pitt.edu/11346/ (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
DAVIS, R., “The ‘Problem of de Gaulle’: British Reactions to General de Gaulle’s Veto of the UK Application to Join the Common Market”, Journal of Contemporary History 32(4), (1997), pp. 453-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200949703200403
DIAMOND, P., NEDERGAARD, P. y ROSAMOND, B. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit, Abingdon, Routledge, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169613
DOWNEY, A. B., Think Complexity, Needham, Massachusetts, Green Tea Press, 2018.
EOYANG, G. H., “Conditions for self-organizing in human systems”, tesis doctoral en Human System Dynamics, EE.UU., The Union Institute and University, 2001.
EOYANG, G. H. y L. YELLOWTHUNDER, “Politics and International Affairs Beyond Bureaucratic Boundaries: A Case Study in Human Systems Dynamics”, en la conferencia Complexity, Science & Society Conference, Liverpool, 11 a 14 de septiembre de 2005.
EVANS, G. y A. MENON, Brexit and British Politics. Cambridge, Medford, Polity Press, 2017.
EVANS, G., N. CARL y J. DENNISON, “European but not European enough: An explanation for Brexit”, European Union Politics 20 (2), (2018), pp. 282–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518802361
FARREL, J. y P. GOLDSMITH, How to Lose a Referendum: The Definitive Story of Why the UK Voted for Brexit, Londres, Biteback Publishing, 2017.
FOSTER, R. y J. GRZYMSKI, “The limits of Europe”, Global Discourse 9 (1), (2019), pp. 5-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204378918X15453934505897
GEORGE S., An Awkward Partner (3rd ed). Oxford, University Press, 1998.
GEYER, R., “European Integration, the Problem of Complexity and the Revision of Theory”, Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (1), (2003), pp. 15-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.t01-1-00409
Gobierno del Reino Unido de la Gran Bretaña, CAB 129/47 Original Reference CP 226 (51)-267 (51), 24 de julio-26 de octubre de 1951, National Archives UK, http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/large/cab-129-47.pdf (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
Gobierno del Reino Unido de la Gran Bretaña, “Cabinet Memorandum. European Integration. Note by the Chancellor of the Exchequer”, 29 de junio de 1955, National Archives UK, http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-129-76-cp-55-55-5.pdf (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
GOODWIN, M. J. y O. HEATH, “The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-level Analysis of the Result”, The Political Quarterly 87(3) (2016), pp. 323-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12285
GOODWIN, M. y C. MILAZZO, “Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (3), (2017), pp. 450-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117710799
GOWLAND, D., Britain and the European Union, Abingdon, Nueva York, Routledge, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463537
GOWLAND, D., A. TURNER y A. WRIGHT, Britain and European Integration Since 1945: on the sidelines, Abingdon, Nueva York, Routledge, (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299906
HENDERSON, A., C. JEFFERY, D. WINCOTT y R. WYN JONES, “How Brexit was made in England”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (4) (2017), pp. 631–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117730542
HOBOLT, S. B., “The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent”, Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 2016, pp. 1259-1277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
HOLZINGER, K. y J. TOSUN, “Why differentiated integration is such a common practice in Europe : A rational explanation”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 31(4), (2019), pp. 642-659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629819875522
HOOGHE, L. y G. MARKS, “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration : From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus”, British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), (2009), pp. 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
HOOGHE, L. y G. MARKS, “Grand theories of European integration in the twenty-first century”, Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (8), (2019), pp. 1113–1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
House of Commons Library, “Referendums on the European Union”, Briefing Paper núm. 7570, 2016.
House of Commons Library, “The UK’s contribution to the EU budget”, Briefing Paper núm. CBP 7886, 2019.
JONES, E., “Towards a theory of disintegration”, Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (3), 2018, pp. 440-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411381
KAVALSKI, E., “The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory : notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20(3), 2007, pp. 435-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570701574154
KAVALSKI, E. (ed.), World Politics at the Edge of Chaos-Reflections on Complexity and Global Life, Albany, Suny Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18473017
KRATOCHWIL, R., Rules, Norms, and Decisions, Cambridge, University Press, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559044
Labour Party, Labour Party Manifesto, 1983, http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1983/1983-labour-manifesto.shtml (consulta del 10 de julio de 2022).
Labour Party, Labour Party Manifesto, 1987, http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1987/1987-labour-manifesto.shtml (consulta del 10 de julio de 2022).
Labour Party, Labour Party Manifesto, 1992, http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1992/1992-labour-manifesto.shtml (consulta del 10 de julio de 2022).
LEHMANN, K. E., “Crisis foreign policy as a process of self-organization”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24 (1), 2011, 27-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558052
LEHMANN, K. E., “Unfinished transformation: The three phases of complexity’s emergence into international relations and foreign policy”, Cooperation and Conflict 47 (3), 2012, pp. 404-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712454274
LEHMANN, K. E., “The Crisis of the European Union as a Complex Adaptive System”, Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (4), 2018, pp. 971-988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12702
LERUTH, B., S. GÄNZLE y J. TRONDAL, “Differentiated integration and disintegration in the European Union: State-of-the-art and ways for future research”, ISL Working Paper, núm. 1, 2017.
LERUTH, B., S. GÄNZEL y J. TRONDAL, “Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(5), 2019, pp. 1013-1030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12869
LERUTH, B., S. GÄNZEL y J. TRONDAL, “Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU after Brexit: Risks versus Opportunities”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6), 2019, pp. 1383-1394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12957
LERUTH, B. y C. LORD, “Differentiated integration in the European Union: a concept, a process, a system or a theory?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (6), 2015, pp. 754-763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1021196
LEUFFEN, D., B. RITTBERGER y F. SCHIMMELFENNIG, Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
LIDDLE, R., The Europe Dilemma: Britain and the Drama of EU Integration, Londres, Nueva York, I.B. Tauris, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755619924
LIDDLE, R., The Risk of Brexit: the politics of a referendum (2.a ed), Lanham, Maryland, Rowan & Littlefield, 2016.
MILLER, B. H., “Tomorrow’s Europe : a never closer union”, Journal of European Integration 39(4), 2017, pp. 421-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1309037
ONUF, N., World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia, University of South Carolina Press, 1989.
ORSINI, A. et al., “Complex Systems and International Governance”, International Studies Review 22 (4), (2020), pp. 1008-1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz005
PARR, H., “Saving the community: The French response to Britain’s second EEC application in 1967”, Cold War History 6(4), 2006, pp. 425-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682740600979287
ROSAMOND, B., “Brexit and the Problem of European Disintegration”, Journal of Contemporary European Research 12 (4), 2016, pp. 864-871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v12i4.807
ROSAMOND, B., “Theorising the EU in crisis: de-Europeanisation as disintegration. Global Discourse”, Global Discourse 9 (1), 2019, pp. 31-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204378918X1545393450591
SANDERS, D., Losing an Empire, Finding a Role: British Foreign Policy since 1945, Nueva York, Macmillan Education, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20747-3
SCARTOZZI, C. M., “A New Taxonomy for International Relations: Rethinking the International System as a Complex Adaptive System”, Journal on Policy and Complex Systems 4(1), 2018, pp. 109-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18278/jpcs.4.1.6
SCHIMMELFENNIG, F., “Brexit: differentiated disintegration in the European Union”, Journal of European Public Policy 25(8), 2018, pp. 1154-1173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954
SCHIMMELFENNIG, F., “The choice for differentiated Europe: an intergovernmentalist theoretical framework”, Comparative European Politics, 17(2), 2019, pp. 176-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00166-5
SCHIMMELFENNIG, F., D. LEUFFEN y B. RITTBERGER, B., “The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: interdependence, politicization and differentiation”, Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 2015, pp. 764-782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835
SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. y T. Winzen, “Grand theories, differentiated integration”, Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 2019, pp. 1172-1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576761
SCHMITTER, P. C., “A Revised Theory of Regional Integration” International Organization, 24(4), 1970, pp. 836-868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300017549
SCHMITTER, P. C. y Z. LEFKOFRIDI, “Neo-Functionalism as a Theory of Disintegration”, Chinese Political Science Review, 1 (1), 2016, pp. 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0012-4
SCHNAPPER, P., La Grande-Bretagne et l’Europe - Le grand malentendu, París, Presses de Sciences Po., 2000.
SCHNAPPER, P. y E. AVRIL, Où va le Royaume-Uni ? Le Brexit et après, París, Odilon Jacob, 2019.
Single European Act, 1986, Official Journal of the European Communities, No L 169/1, 26 de junio de 1987, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11986U/TXT&from=EN (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
SWALES, K., “Understanding the Leave vote”, NatCen Social Research, 2016, pp. 1-32.
The Electoral Commission, “Results and turnout at the EU referendum” [sitio web], https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/who-we-are-and-what-we-do/elections-and-referendums/past-elections-and-referendums/eu-referendum/results-and-turnout-eu-referendum (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
TINDEMANS, L., “European Union. Report by Mr. Leo Tindemans, Prime Minister of Belgium, to the European Council”, Bulletin of the European Communities Supplement 1/76, 29 de diciembre de 1975, http://aei.pitt.edu/942/ (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
Tratado de Ámsterdam, 1997, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/es/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/treaty-of-amsterdam (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
Tratado de Lisboa, 2007, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12007L/TXT (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
Tratado de Maastricht, 1992, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/es/FTU_1.1.3.pdf (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
Tratado de Roma, 25 de marzo de 1957, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/es/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/treaty-of-rome (consulta del 20 de mayo de 2021).
USHERWOOD, S., “Brexit as a Cause and a Consequence of Political Change in the UK El Brexit como causa y consecuencia del cambio político en el Reino Unido”, Political Change 96 (1), 2017, pp. 103-111.
VASILOPOULOU, S., “UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit Referendum”, The Political Quarterly 87(2), 2016, pp. 219–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12258
WALL, S., A Stranger in Europe: Britain and the EU from Thatcher to Blair, Oxford, University Press, 2008.
WALKER, R. B. J., Inside/outside: international relations as political theory, Cambridge, University Press, 1995.
WEBBER, D., “Trends in European political (dis)integration. An analysis of postfunctionalist and other explanations”. Journal of European Public Policy 26(8), 2019, pp. 1134-1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576760
WIENER, A., “A theory of contestation - A concise summary of its argument and concepts”, Polity 49(1), 2017, pp. 109-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/690100
WIENER, A., T. A. BÖRZEL y T. RISSE (eds.), European Integration Theory (3.a ed.), Oxford, University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198737315.001.0001
WINZEN, T. y F. SCHIMMELFENNIG, “Explaining differentiation in European Union treaties”, European Union Politics 17 (4), 2016, pp. 616-637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516640386
ZÜRN, M., “The politicization of world politics and its effects: eight propositions”, European Political Science Review 6 (1), 2014, pp. 47-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000276
