Ideología política y cargas administrativas en México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.3132Palabras clave:
cargas administrativas, tolerancia a cargas, ideología política, México, López ObradorResumen
¿En qué medida influye la ideología en la tolerancia de la población a las cargas administrativas que dificultan el acceso a los servicios y programas públicos? A partir de datos originales de una encuesta en México, este estudio muestra que la demanda de una menor carga administrativa se asocia principalmente con sectores del electorado que se identifican con la izquierda. Sin embargo, el efecto de la ideología se atenúa entre quienes tienen una relación directa con el Estado, ya sea como beneficiarios de programas o como contribuyentes. El aumento o la reducción de las cargas administrativas no es, por lo tanto, una cuestión meramente técnica de gestión de servicios o beneficios públicos, sino una cuestión política con implicaciones electorales potencialmente importantes. Esto ayuda a explicar por qué un gobierno de izquierda como el de López Obrador priorizó la reducción de intermediarios y condicionalidades en la entrega de beneficios sociales.
Descargas
Citas
Aarhus University. Department of Political Science. s.f. The Psychology of Administrative Burden (POAB). https://ps.au.dk/en/research/research-projects/administrative-burden
AARØE, L., Martin BAEKGAARD, Julian CHRISTENSEN y Donald P. MOYNIHAN. 2021. “Personality and Public Administration: Policymaker Tolerance of Administrative Burdens in Welfare Services”. Public Administration Review 81: 652-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13381
AGUINIS, Herman, Ryan K. GOTTFREDSON y Harry JOO. 2013. Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers. Organizational Research Methods 16(2): 270-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281124708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848
ARELLANO-GAULT, David. 2020. “Responding to the Populist Attack on Public Administration”. Asia
Pacific Journal of Public Administration 42(1): 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1733854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1733854
ATTANASIO, Orazio P., Veruska OPPEDISANO y Marcos VERA-HERNÁNDEZ. 2015. “Should Cash Transfers Be Conditional? Conditionality, Preventive Care, and Health Outcomes”. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7(2): 35–52. https://doi.org//10.1257/app.20130126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130126
BAEKGAARD, Martin, Soren K. LARSEN y Peter B. MORTENSEN. 2019. “Negative Feedback, Political Attention, and Public Policy”. Public Administration 97: 210–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12569
BAEKGAARD, Martin, Donald P. MOYNIHAN y Mette Kjaergaard THOMSEN. 2021. “Why Do Policymakers Support Administrative Burdens? The Roles of Deservingness, Political Ideology, and Personal Experience”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31(1): 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa033
BAEKGAARD, Martin y Tara TANKINK. 2022. “Administrative Burden: Untangling a Bowl of Conceptual Spaghetti”. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 5(1): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab027
BAIRD, Sarah, Craig MCINTOSH y Berk ÖZLER, B. 2011. “Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 1709–1753. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr032
BARNES, Carolyn y Julia HENLY. 2018. “‘They Are Underpaid and Understaffed’: How Clients Interpret Encounters with Street-Level Bureaucrats”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(2): 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy008
BAUER, Paul C., Pablo BARBERÁ, Kathrin ACKERMANN y Aaron VENETZ. 2017. “Is the Left-Right Scale a Valid Measure of Ideology?”. Political Behavior 39: 553–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9368-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9368-2
BÉLAND, Daniel, Andrea Louise CAMPBELL y R. Kent WEAVER. 2022. “Policy Feedback: How Policies Shape Politics”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938914
BELL, Elizabeth, James E. WRIGHT y Jeongmin OH. 2024. “Does Administrative Burden Create Racialized Policy Feedback? How Losing Access to Public Benefits Impacts Beliefs About Government”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 34(3): 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae004
BELL, Elizabeth, Ani TER-MKRTCHYAN, Wesley WEHDE y Kylie SMITH. 2021. “Just or Unjust? How Ideological Beliefs Shape Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Perceptions of Administrative Burden”. Public Administration Review 81(4): 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13311
BENTELE, Keith G. y Erin E. O’Brien. 2013. “Jim Crow 2.0? Why States Consider and Adopt Restrictive Voter Access Policies”. Perspectives on Politics 11: 1088–1116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713002843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713002843
BRINKS, Daniel M., LEVITSKY, Steven y María Victoria MURILLO, eds. 2020. The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776608
BRODKIN, Evelyn Z. y Malay MAJMUNDAR. 2010. “Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup046
BURDEN, Barry C., David T. CANON, Kenneth R. MAYER, Donald P. MOYNIHAN. 2012. “The Effect of Administrative Burden on Bureaucratic Perception of Policies: Evidence from Election Administration”. Public Administration Review 72(5): 741–751. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41687989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x
CAMPBELL, Jesse W. y Yongjin AHN. 2023. “What Factors Underlie Burden Tolerance in South Korea? Policy Implementation Domain, Administrative Efficiency and Bureaucratic Personality”. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 45(4): 362–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2228435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2228435
CHRISTENSEN, Julian, Lene AARØE, Martin BAEKGAARD, Pamela HERD y Donald P. MOYNIHAN. 2020. “Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen-State Interactions”. Public Administration Review 80(1): 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13134
CHUDNOVSKY, Mariana y Rik PEETERS. 2019. “Más allá de la focalización de la política pública: incidencia de factores extraorganizacionales en la falta de cobertura de ciudadanos elegibles en la asignación universal por hijo en Argentina”. Estado, Gobierno y Gestión Pública 17: 5-37. https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-8980.2019.56465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-8980.2019.56465
CHUDNOVSKY, Mariana y Rik PEETERS. 2021. “The Unequal Distribution of Administrative Burden: A Framework and an Illustrative Case Study for Understanding Variation in People’s Experience of Burdens”. Social Policy and Administration 55(4): 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12639
DUSSAUGE-LAGUNA, Mauricio I. 2021. “Doublespeak Populism and Public Administration: The Case of Mexico”. En Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration: How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies: 178–199, edición de M. W. Bauer, B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit y S. Becker. Cambridge, R.U.: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023504.009
DUSSAUGE-LAGUNA, Mauricio I. 2022. “The Promises and Perils of Populism for Democratic Policymaking: The Case of Mexico”. Policy Sciences 55(4): 777-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09469-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09469-z
FORDING, Richard C. y Dana PATTON. 2020. “The Affordable Care Act and the Diffusion of Policy Feedback: The Case of Medicaid Work Requirements”. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(2): 131-153. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2020.6.2.06
GONZÁLEZ-VÁZQUEZ, Alejandro, Fernando NIETO-MORALES y Rik PEETERS. 2023. “Parabureaucracy: The Case of Mexico’s ‘Servants of the Nation’”. Governance 37(S1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12807
HALLING, Aske y Martin BAEKGAARD. 2023. “Administrative Burden in Citizen–State Interactions. A Systematic Literature Review”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 34(2): 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad023
HALLING, Aske, Pamela HERD y Donald P. MOYNIHAN. 2023. “How Difficult Should It Be? Evidence of Burden Tolerance from a Nationally Representative Survey”. Public Management Review 25(11): 2053–2072. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2056910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2056910
HEINRICH, Carolyn J. 2016. “The Bite of Administrative Burden: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3): 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv034
HEINRICH, Carolyn J. 2018. “Presidential Address: ‘A Thousand Petty Fortresses’: Administrative Burden in U.S. Immigration Policies and its Consequences”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37(2): 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22046
HERD, Pamela y Donald P. MOYNIHAN. 2018. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. Nueva York: Russell Sage Foundation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448789
INGLEHART, Ronald F. y Pippa NORRIS. 2016. “Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash”. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026, agosto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
MADSEN, Jonas K., Kim S. MIKKELSEN y Donald P. MOYNIHAN. 2022. “Burdens, Sludge, Ordeals, Red Tape, Oh My! A User’s Guide to the Study of Frictions”. Public Administration 100(2): 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12717
MASOOD, Ayesha y Muhammad Azfar NISAR. 2021. “Administrative Capital and Citizens’ Responses to Administrative Burden”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31(1): 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa031
MEDOFF, Marshall H. y Christopher DENNIS. 2011. “TRAP Abortion Laws and Partisan Political Party Control of State Government”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70 (4): 951–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00794.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00794.x
MOOKHERJEE, Dilip y Stefan NAPEL. 2021. “Welfare Rationales for Conditionality of Cash Transfers”. Journal of Development Economics 151: 102657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102657
MOYNIHAN, Donald P. y Joe SOSS. 2014. “Policy Feedback and the Politics of Administration”. Public Administration Review 74: 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12200
MOYNIHAN, Donald P., Pamela HERD y Hope HARVEY. 2015. “Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1): 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
MOYNIHAN, D.P., Pamela HERD y Elizabeth RIGBY. 2016. “Policymaking by Other Means: Do States Use Administrative Barriers to Limit Access to Medicaid”. Administration & Society 48(4): 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713503540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713503540
MOYNIHAN, Donald, Julie GERZINA y Pamela HERD. 2022. “Kafka’s Bureaucracy: Immigration Administrative Burdens in the Trump Era”. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 5(1): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab025
NISAR, Muhammad A. 2018. “Children of a Lesser God: Administrative Burden and Social Equity in Citizen-State Interactions”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(1): 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux025
PEETERS, Rik. 2020. “The Political Economy of Administrative Burdens: A Theoretical Framework for Analyzing the Organizational Origins of Administrative Burdens”. Administration & Society 52(4): 566-592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719854367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719854367
PEETERS, Rik y Fernando NIETO MORALES, eds. 2020. La máquina de la desigualdad. Una exploración de los costos y las causas de las burocracias de baja confianza. Ciudad de México: CIDE y Colegio de México.
PEETERS, Rik, Humberto TRUJILLO JIMÉNEZ, Elizabeth O’CONNOR, Pascual OGARRIO ROJAS, Michele GONZÁLEZ GALINDO y Daniela MORALES TENORIO. 2018. “Low-Trust Bureaucracy: Understanding the Mexican Bureaucratic Experience”. Public Administration & Development 38: 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1824
PERALES FERNÁNDEZ, Fabiola O. 2023. “Capacidades administrativas que estructuran las cargas administrativas en el acceso a derechos sociales” (tesis doctoral). Ciudad de México: CIDE.
RAMÍREZ, Viviana y Ricardo VELÁZQUEZ LEYER. 2023. “The Impact of Self-Reinforcing and Self-Undermining Policy Feedback on Mexican Social Policy: The End of the Conditional Cash Transfer Programme”. Policy & Politics 51(3): 508-529. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16813697853773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16813697853773
RENTERÍA, César y David ARELLANO-GAULT. 2021. “How Does a Populist Government Interpret and Face a Health Crisis? Evidence from the Mexican Populist Response to COVID-19”. Revista de Administração Pública 55(1): 180-196. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200524
SCHNEIDER, Anne y Helen INGRAM. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy”. American Political Science Review 87(2): 334–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044
SOSS, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action”. American Political Science Review 93: 363–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2585401
Soss, Joe y Sanford F. SCHRAM. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback”. American Political Science Review 101(1): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049
STRACH, Patricia, Elizabeth PÉREZ-CHIQUÉS y Katie ZUBER. 2024. “Learning by Proxy: How Burdensome Policies Shape Policy Implementors’ Views of Government”. Policy Studies Journal 52(4): 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12554
UGARTE ONTIVEROS, Darwin y Ruth Marcela APARICIO DE GUZMAN. 2021. “Técnicas robustas y no robustas para identificar outliers en el análisis de regresión”. Revista Investigación y Desarrollo 20(2): 41-56. https://doi.org/10.23881/idupbo.020.2-3e DOI: https://doi.org/10.23881/idupbo.020.2-3e
UNDERHILL, K., E. DIXON, E. BAIR, W. FERRELL, K. VOLPP y A. VENKATARAMANI. 2020. “Support for Work Requirements But Opposition to Terminating Benefits Among Medicaid Enrollees and Non Enrollees in Kentucky: Results from a Statewide Survey”. Health Services Research 55: 35-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13374
YATES, Sophie, Gemma CAREY, Eleanor MALBON y Jen HARGRAVE. 2022. “‘Faceless Monster, Secret Society’: Women’s Experiences Navigating the Administrative Burden of Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme”. Health & Social Care in the Community 30, e2308–e2317. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13669
ZECHMEISTER, Elizabeth. 2006. “What’s Left and Who’s Right? A Q-Method Study of Individual and Contextual Influences on the Meaning of Ideological Labels”. Political Behavior 28: 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9006-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9006-5
